While fast-forwarding through the ad break
of a TV programme I recorded recently, I found myself using the sponsorship
ident things as a marker so that I could press the ‘play’ button in time for
the next bit of the show.
Personally, I think the Joop Homme ads,
which are attached to The Walking Dead like relentless zombies, are the best for
this as they’re the same clip of a pissed-looking pair of models, moodily
smooching about while some words and pink stuff appears.
As a parent, recorded TV is pretty much all
I get to watch, so most of the sponsorship surrounding these shows is wasted on
me. In my head I associate Joop (which I’ve clocked is a perfume) with the
frustration of a break in my entertainment, and decomposing people.
When I have been lucky enough to watch the
show ‘live’ the sponsorship idents annoy me in another way. Because they’re the
same film over and over again, they soon become irritating. Eventually, after
the 8 millionth viewing, they move past annoying and into the realms of invisibility.
Now some would say that the fact I remember
the name and nature of the product is a good thing and I can’t really argue
with that, but I would have thought that the association with frustration,
irritation and undead people might not be the best use of a product’s marketing
budget.
I appreciate how difficult TV sponsorship
can be: we’ve done our fair share over the course of our career, and in my
experience they’re always tough. For one thing, fitting a message into such
short time lengths is always problematic. The simplicity, charm and whit of the
Doritos ones from a few years back are a rarely matched.
Doritos embraced the small budget that so
often goes hand in hand with these kind of jobs, but often there’s the dilemma
of either making lots of spots that look slightly cheap, or making a small
number of nice-looking ads which then run the risk of boring the viewer
quickly.
God knows why, but the public consistently
vote that bit in Only Fools And Horses where Del Boy falls through the bar as
“the funniest thing ever.” Yet even that, if it were played constantly during
Coronation Street, would get on the nation’s nerves eventually.
Added to this, it seems that more and more
the programme you’re asked to sponsor often bears no relation to the product
you’re advertising. In the olden days, there seemed to be a desire on the part
of the programmer and advertiser to find an ideal fit; either through the
product, its end line, or even the shared target market.
Nowadays that feels as if that’s all gone
out of the window. Nowadays you wouldn’t bat an eyelid if you saw a pasta sauce
linked to a show about embarrassing vaginas.
As an industry we need to try a little
harder; increase budgets, avoid repetition, associate with relevant shows, and
aim to keep the viewer entertained.
Either that, or do something really useful and
just stick a big ‘FAST FORWARD’ or ‘PLAY’ above the logo, so I can perfect my
remote control control.
No comments:
Post a Comment